Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 120
02/20/2012 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB267 | |
| HB234 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 234 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 267 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 293 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 262 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 267 - REAL ESTATE SALES LICENSEES/COM'N
1:03:03 PM
CHAIR GATTO announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 267, "An Act relating to the Real Estate
Commission; and providing for an effective date." [Before the
committee was CSHB 267(L&C).]
CHAIR GATTO directed the committee's attention to Amendment 1
labeled 27-LS1111\B.2, Martin, 2/17/12.
The committee took an at-ease from 1:04 p.m. to 1:06 p.m.
1:07:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON made a motion to adopt Amendment 1,
labeled 27-LS1111\B.2, Martin, 2/17/12, which read:
Page 4, following line 4:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 2. AS 08.88.305 is amended by adding a new
subsection to read:
(b) A person licensed as an associate real
estate broker or a real estate salesperson may not be
employed to perform activities requiring licensure
under this chapter for more than one licensed real
estate broker."
Renumber the following bill sections accordingly.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES objected for discussion purposes.
1:07:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY MUNOZ, Alaska State Legislature, speaking
as one of the joint prime sponsors of HB 267, explained that
Amendment 1 doesn't change any language in the legislation;
rather, it provides clarification of the intention stated in the
amendment.
CHAIR GATTO added that Amendment 1 ensures that an individual
may only work for one broker. Without Amendment 1, he opined,
the existing language in CSHB 267(L&C) allows a licensed real
estate assistant to work for more than one broker because the
language doesn't prohibit it. Amendment 1 clarifies the
legislation to ensure that [a licensed real estate broker] can
only work for one broker.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG surmised that Amendment 1 addresses
ambiguity in Section 2 and inquired as to what the existing
Section 2 does as opposed to what Section 2, as amended by
Amendment 1, would do.
1:10:17 PM
HILARY MARTIN, Attorney, Legislative Legal Counsel, Legislative
Legal and Research Services, Legislative Affairs Agency (LAA),
as the drafter, explained that the existing statute in Section 2
could have been read in different ways. The language could have
been read to allow a licensed assistant to work for someone
other than the broker that employs that licensed assistant.
Therefore, the licensed assistant could have worked in another
broker's office. The existing language could have also been
read to mean that a licensed assistant could work for someone
other than the broker who employs that licensed assistant. The
[proposed] language in Section 2 clarifies that "a licensed
assistant ... can work as a licensed assistant to another
licensed salesperson or associate real estate broker as long as
they both work for the same broker".
CHAIR GATTO related his understanding that the original language
allowed a [licensed assistant] to work for more than one
licensed real estate broker because there was no prohibition.
Therefore, he opined that the existing language wasn't unclear
to him and he questioned whether it was unclear to [Ms. Martin]
and that the language restricted the [licensed assistant to work
for] only one broker.
MS. MARTIN offered her belief, "The original language, it could
have been read that you could work for another broker or it
could have meant other than the broker who employs the
salesperson, it could have been referring to the licensed person
you're working for so that you could work for a different broker
or you could work for a different licensee that's not the broker
in your office." She opined that the language didn't clearly
state that one could work for only one licensed real estate
broker.
CHAIR GATTO asked whether Amendment 1 would allow [a licensed
assistant] to work for a broker in another state or another
country.
MS. MARTIN answered that she didn't know, but pointed out that
it could be dependent upon how "licensed real estate broker" is
defined.
The committee took an at-ease from 1:14 p.m. to 1:16 p.m.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG questioned whether Section 2 [in CSHB
267(L&C)] is necessary if the new Section 2 is clear.
CHAIR GATTO pointed out that Section 2 [in CSHB 267(L&C)]
consists of five paragraphs. In further response to
Representative Gruenberg, Chair Gatto agreed with Representative
Gruenberg that in Section 2, paragraphs (1)-(5) [of CSHB
267(L&C)] are conjunctive rather than disjunctive.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES related that in the House Labor and
Commerce Standing Committee it was clarified that in Section 2,
paragraphs (1)-(5) are conjunctive and thus include all five
paragraphs.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said that if those paragraphs remain,
he would then make a motion to insert "and" [between paragraphs
(4) and (5)] in order to ensure there is no question that those
are conjunctive.
1:17:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG inquired as to what the proposed
Section 2 in Amendment 1 would do that Section 2 in CSHB
267(L&C) doesn't.
MS. MARTIN offered her belief that a licensed assistant is a
separate arrangement and this clarifies that one can only work
as a licensed assistant to a licensed salesperson or a licensed
real estate broker and the licensed assistant has to work for
someone who works for the same broker as the licensed assistant.
In further response to Representative Gruenberg, Ms. Martin
confirmed that she believes that [the language in Section 2 of
CSHB 267(L&C) and the language in proposed Amendment 1] are
appropriate.
CHAIR GATTO posed a scenario in which a [licensed assistant]
working in Canada wanted to also work in Alaska.
MS. MARTIN pointed out that the individual would have to be
licensed in Alaska in order to work for a broker in Alaska. She
related her understanding that the individual would have to
relinquish their broker's license [as is the case when a broker
has a license] from another state.
CHAIR GATTO highlighted that that's true for brokers, but this
is a discussion about a licensed real estate salesperson. The
question he said is whether a licensed real estate salesperson
in Whitehorse, Canada, could fly to Anchorage, Alaska, to
request employment with a second broker. Therefore, he
questioned whether Alaska's law would only apply to a second
broker in the same state and exclude the rest of the planet.
MS. MARTIN said she believed so.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN noted that licensees other than the real
estate broker aren't really employees but rather independent
contractors. Therefore, he questioned whether the term employee
should be used under employment.
CHAIR GATTO directed attention to the language on page 4, lines
19-22, and asked if that refers to the broker.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN reiterated that the licensed real estate
salesperson is an independent contractor and it would be
extremely rare not to be. However, a situation in which a
licensed assistant who doesn't perform listings or sales but
simply works for a broker may well be an employment situation.
Those independent contractors working for the broker are paid a
share of the commission; the [independent contractor] isn't paid
directly but rather is only paid by the broker. Therefore, the
language needs to clarify that typically the employment
situation only apples to a licensed assistant who is working for
a wage rather than a commission.
1:22:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG indicated agreement with Representative
Lynn's comments. However, he suggested that it would be easier
to utilize the existing Section 2 of CSHB 267(L&C) and amend it
as follows:
Page 4, line 10, preceding "if":
Insert "only"
Page 4, line 22, following ";":
Insert "and"
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG also suggested inserting a new
subsection to read: "The person licensed as an associate real
estate broker or a real estate salesperson is not employed to
perform activities [requiring licensure under this chapter for
more than one licensed real estate broker.]" The aforementioned
approach would result in everything being in one place in
statute as the current drafting is a bit confusing, he opined.
With regard to Representative Lynn's concern regarding the use
of the term "employed", Representative Gruenberg suggested
seeking the advice of the industry.
1:26:01 PM
DON HABEGER, Director, Division of Corporations, Business, and
Professional Licensing, Department of Commerce, Community &
Economic Development (DCCED), said he, too, would defer to
industry in regard to the use of the terms "employed by" or
"contracted with".
1:26:56 PM
ERROL CHAMPION, President, Southeast Alaska Board of Realtors;
Member, Board of Directors, Alaska Association of Realtors,
informed the committee that although he has a broker's license,
the regulations are written in such a way that since he works
for a broker as a licensed independent he is referred to as an
associate broker. There can only be one broker per
organization. Mr. Champion stated that he could work for
himself and be an independent broker. He then related support
for HB 267.
CHAIR GATTO inquired as to whether Mr. Champion is an employee
of the broker or a contractor of the broker.
MR. CHAMPION clarified that he is a licensed independent
contractor.
CHAIR GATTO surmised then that Mr. Champion isn't an employee.
MR. CHAMPION related that in terms of normal employee relations,
no benefits are provided and he has to function on his own.
However, he cautioned the committee that may not be the case for
every broker in Alaska because he knew that some brokers have
employees, albeit these employees don't practice real estate.
CHAIR GATTO clarified that the legislation only addresses
associate real estate brokers and real estate salespersons. He
clarified that he wanted to ascertain, under the rules of a
contractor, whether there are employees who do the same thing as
the [licensed independent] contractor.
MR. CHAMPION explained that he could employ a licensed assistant
to help him with his work.
CHAIR GATTO surmised, though, that such an assistant wouldn't be
a real estate salesperson or licensed associate [real estate
broker].
MR. CHAMPION informed the committee that the assistant is
licensed by the Division of Corporations, Business, and
Professional Licensing and has taken training and passed the
test. In further response to Chair Gatto, he acknowledged that
the assistant would be working for him.
CHAIR GATTO inquired as to whether the [licensed assistant] is
employed by the broker.
MR. CHAMPION stated that the license of the [licensed assistant]
must hang in the office of the broker. In response to
Representative Lynn, Mr. Champion confirmed that the [licensed
assistant] doesn't perform listings and sales.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN likened licensed assistants to legislative
staff as licensed assistants make phone calls, address escrow
matters, coordinate with the lender, etcetera. Without a
license it's very easy to venture into licensed activities, he
opined. Therefore, in order to prevent [an assistant] from
venturing into licensed activities, there's a real estate
license and the licensed assistant is paid a wage rather than a
commission.
MR. CHAMPION stated his agreement.
1:30:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN further clarified that a licensed
salesperson receives a commission. The money from the real
estate sale goes to the broker only and the broker gives the
licensee a percentage of that sale, depending upon the
commission split. He surmised, though, that the licensed
assistant typically receives a wage not a commission. He
reiterated his earlier comments that it's very easy for someone
to unwittingly do something that only a real estate licensee is
allowed to do.
CHAIR GATTO posed an example in which he decides to sell his
house and calls a [real estate] agent rather than a broker. The
agent secures a buyer for the house. The agent works for the
broker and sometimes there are two brokers, one for the seller
and one for the buyer.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN explained that although a licensee may fill
out the paperwork for the listing, the listing belongs to the
broker. Oftentimes, when a licensee goes to a different broker,
the listings of the licensee remain with the first broker as
does any commission that results from that listing/sale.
MR. CHAMPION agreed with Representative Lynn's explanation and
reiterated that all listings belong to the brokers not the
agent. Furthermore, if an agent moves from one broker to
another, it would be up to the broker under which the listing
was obtained to determine whether the agent can take the
listing. He doubted that the agent would be allowed to take the
listing to his/her new broker.
1:33:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN disclosed that he is a licensed Alaska real
estate associate broker, and thus he has a conflict of interest.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG observed that the term "employs" is in
current law. He suggested that any use of that term throughout
the legislation should be reviewed regarding whether it should
be changed or a definition of it specified in the legislation.
CHAIR GATTO pointed out that the term "employed" can be found in
AS 08.88.305 as follows:
Sec. 08.88.305. Multiple business operations. A
person licensed as a real estate broker may own,
operate, or be employed by multiple corporations,
partnerships, or other business organizations engaging
in activities for which a license is required under
this chapter, provided that each business organization
is registered with the commission, and that the
principal offices of all of the business organizations
share a single physical address.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES related that the term "to employ" is
defined in a dictionary as "to either engage the services of or
provide a job that pays wages". Therefore, she surmised that
the term "employ" includes contract. If the desire is to change
the language, she suggested that it should be changed to "employ
and contract with" throughout the legislation.
1:35:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT expressed the need to be cautious because
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) separates the two and there
are 20 different distinct criteria. Therefore, he suggested
seeking council from Legislative Legal and Research Services.
CHAIR GATTO agreed. He then directed attention to AS 08.88.910,
as follows:
Sec. 08.88.910. Application to independent
contractors. The provisions of this chapter that
apply to employment relationships and employees also
apply to contracting relationships and independent
contractors.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG recalled that provision was enacted in
1998. Prior to 1998, either a court/agency adjudicated whether
a person was truly an employee when they have many of the
indices of being an employee. The broker just said that [the
employee] is an independent contractor so that the broker
wouldn't have to withhold wages, taxes, and etcetera. He opined
that it has been a big deal in the real estate industry.
CHAIR GATTO surmised then that withholding is another hitch.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN mentioned that independent contractors are
also responsible for their own working hours. Independent
contractors are in business for themselves.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES ventured her belief that AS 08.88.910 does
clarify that within this entire chapter, references to
employment relationships and employees also refers to
contracting relationships and independent contractors.
Therefore, she opined that the terms "employ" and "employment"
can be used.
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT agreed that it seems that state law has
done due diligence to provide clarity in this particular
section, but it doesn't mean that the clarity exists for the
IRS.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON withdrew Amendment 1.
1:44:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG made a motion to adopt Conceptual
Amendment 2, as follows:
Page 4, line 10, preceding "if":
Insert "only"
Insert a new subsection to read:
"The person licensed as an associate real estate
broker or a real estate salesperson is not employed to
perform activities requiring licensure under this
chapter for more than one licensed real estate
broker;"
Renumber accordingly.
Page 4, line 22, following ";":
Insert "and"
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES objected for discussion purposes.
The committee took an at-ease from 1:48 p.m. to 1:52 p.m.
MS. MARTIN said that if the intent is to clarify for whom a
licensed assistant can perform those activities, then Conceptual
Amendment 2 accomplishes that.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES expressed the need to ensure no
ambiguities are created in terms of what people can and can't do
by placing the language in the subsection rather than the
statute as a whole.
MS. MARTIN offered that Conceptual Amendment 2 would clarify
licensed assistants but not change anything else currently in
statute. She explained that she originally proposed a separate
subsection in Amendment 1 because she understood the goal was to
have it be a rule for every licensed real estate salesperson or
associate real estate broker. However, if the intent is to
merely refer to licensed assistants, then it's fine as a
[paragraph]. In response to Chair Gatto, Ms. Martin explained
that a licensed assistant has to be licensed and thus would have
to be a real estate salesperson or an associate real estate
broker. In further response to Chair Gatto, she related her
understanding that a licensed assistant is a special
relationship that is entered into separate from other
relationships, which is why there is a separate subsection
addressing licensed assistants.
1:55:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES noted her understanding that the sponsor
of HB 267 is amenable to Conceptual Amendment 2.
MS. MARTIN directed the committee's attention to existing
AS 08.88.398, which in part says:
A licensed real estate salesperson or licensed
associate real estate broker may act as a licensed
assistant to a real estate licensee other than the
broker who employs the salesperson or associate broker
if
MS. MARTIN said that language is referring to a licensed
individual who acts as an assistant to another licensee. In
response to questions, Ms. Martin opined that the use of the
language "may act" is fine since the relationship [between the
licensed assistant and another licensed salesperson or associate
real estate broker] is clarified by paragraphs (1)-(5).
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES removed her objection to Conceptual
Amendment 2. There being no further objection, Conceptual
Amendment 2 was adopted.
2:00:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG made a motion to adopt Amendment 3,
labeled 27-LS1111\B.1, Martin, 2/14/12, which read:
Page 1, line 1, following "Commission;":
Insert "relating to temporary permits issued by
the Real Estate Commission; relating to licensed
assistants who are employed by other real estate
licensees; relating to contributions by a real estate
licensee to a charitable organization;"
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES objected for discussion purposes.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked if, in light of the prior
changes, Amendment 3 "will do the trick."
MS. MARTIN replied yes.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES withdrew her objection to Amendment 3.
There being no further objection, Amendment 3 was adopted.
CHAIR GATTO asked whether the passage of CSHB 267(L&C), as
amended, would prevent an individual from working for a broker
in Los Angeles in the winter and then working for a broker in
Anchorage in the summer. He said he isn't in favor of
preventing an individual from working two jobs, which it seems
to do because the legislation says [the licensed assistant] can
work for only one broker.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN explained that he was a licensed broker in
California and after moving to Alaska obtained an Alaska
license. The California license was inactive once he was in
Alaska, but had he returned to California he could've worked in
California. Although he could have actively practiced in both
states, he couldn't practice in California because he wasn't
with a broker in California. In further response to Chair
Gatto, Representative Lynn recalled that a [licensee] moving to
another state to work does have to take action. He informed the
committee that he is a licensee now, but since being in the
legislature he has been in referral status only.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG referred to AS 08.88.161, which says:
"Sec. 08.88.161. License required.
Unless licensed as a real estate broker, associate
real estate broker, or real estate salesperson in this
state, a person may not, except as otherwise provided
in this chapter,"
2:07:10 PM
CHAIR GATTO clarified that he is trying to ascertain whether an
individual can hold multiple licenses [from various states].
MR. CHAMPION specified that in Alaska one must have an Alaska
license to practice real estate.
CHAIR GATTO pointed out that the language specifies that an
individual may only work for one real estate broker. He posed a
scenario in which a licensed individual works for a broker in
Los Angeles and doesn't deactivate his California license while
living in Alaska. In such a situation, could the licensed
individual work for a broker in Alaska. He likened this
situation to a driver's license in that an individual who
obtains a driver's license in one state, but moves to another
state has to forfeit their driver's license from the state from
which they move before being allowed to obtain a driver's
license from the state to which they moved.
MR. CHAMPION explained that in Alaska a real estate license is a
two-year license. He further explained that he could request
his license to be inactive and continue to pay a fee and his
Alaska real estate license would continue to be with the broker
for which he works. During that time in which his Alaska real
estate license is inactive, in another state he could acquire a
license to the point of being a broker. If he were to return to
Alaska and wanted to practice real estate, he would have to
reactivate his Alaska license.
CHAIR GATTO asked if in the aforementioned situation,
Mr. Champion would have to deactivate his real estate license
from another state.
MR. CHAMPION said he couldn't speak to the rules of other
states.
2:09:32 PM
NORMAN ROKEBERG, Alaska Real Estate Coalition, explained that
it's allowable for an individual to work with referrals or an
out-of-state broker to work with an Alaskan licensee. He then
related his belief that one can have licenses from various
states and practice real estate in those states. With regard to
HB 267, Section 2 specifically relates only to licensed
assistants. As a point of clarification, Mr. Rokeberg stated
that there could be assistants in employment relationships that
aren't licensed. Regarding Amendment 2, Mr. Rokeberg said that
if it relates only to AS 08.88.398, then it's agreeable to him.
He opined that there shouldn't be any problems or questions
regarding cooperation or interstate commerce as it relates to
real estate transactions.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG disclosed that his late father was an
industrial real estate broker in California and worked in
various states. He surmised that the aforementioned would
continue to be permissible upon passage of HB 267.
MR. ROKEBERG concurred, adding that the only question revolves
around the real estate licensed assistant. He told the committee
he is currently representing the Alaska Real Estate Coalition,
which consists of (indisc.) and real estate licensees that
aren't necessarily members of the Realtors Association; these
are individuals who are interested in enhancing the public
policy and education of Alaskans regarding issues of real
property and other real estate issues. Mr. Rokeberg related
support for HB 267.
2:15:27 PM
DAVID SOMERS, Industry Issues Chairman, Alaska Association of
Realtors, related that he has been a broker in Fairbanks for 47
years. He then related his support for [CSHB 267(L&C), as
amended].
CHAIR GATTO, after having ascertained that no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 267.
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT inquired as to what the licensed assistant
does.
MR. CHAMPION offered his understanding that a "licensed
assistant" is a contracted individual that is different than a
full licensee that represents buyers and sellers, an associate
broker who has taken advanced training and acquired the broker's
license, and the broker. A licensed assistant is simply an
individual that likely works guaranteed hours with guaranteed
earnings. A licensed assistant enjoys the rights a license
provides, such that the licensed assistant can show property,
discuss terms and conditions, and go out on appraisals and
inspections. A regular employee can't do the aforementioned, he
said. In fact, statute prohibits a regular employee from
discussing many details of a real estate sale, including the
price.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN concurred, adding that basically licensed
assistants perform those duties that a salesperson is too busy
to do, such as coordination with loan companies, advertising,
escrow issues, and showing property. He echoed his earlier
comment that licensed assistants don't receive a commission. He
then reminded the committee that if any of the aforementioned
duties are performed by an unlicensed individual, it would be
problematic. In response to Chair Gatto, Representative Lynn
confirmed that a homeowner can put his own home for sale without
having a license.
2:20:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT surmised then that a broker and an
assistant broker will be able to go to California and sell real
estate. He questioned whether a licensed assistant [in Alaska]
would be able to go to California and work at a real estate
agency in California.
MR. CHAMPION replied yes, but clarified that the individual must
have a license from the state in which he is practicing real
estate.
MR. ROKEBERG added that it's important to understand that under
the contractual employment relationship between a broker or an
associate broker and another sales agency as an assistant, the
assistant remains under the umbrella of the broker. The broker
has to supervisor the licensee, which is a standard practice.
Mr. Rokeberg opined that a [licensed assistant] couldn't
practice in various states.
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT recalled that the discussion has been that
[a licensed assistant] isn't an employee. He opined that if [a
licensed assistant] holds a license [in one state and then moves
to another state for work], there is no reason he/she should
have to forfeit his/her license in the state from which he/she
originally was licensed. He clarified that his concern is
regarding whether this legislation prohibits a licensed
assistant from practicing in another state in which he/she is
licensed and then from working as a licensed assistant in the
state in which he originally holds a license and to which he
returns.
CHAIR GATTO inquired as to the situation in which a licensed
assistant wants to move within Alaska, say between Fairbanks and
Anchorage.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN explained that a licensee working for a
licensed broker can go anywhere in Alaska to list and sell
property. Although typically there would be a referral from a
broker or a salesperson in the area, there's nothing stopping
the licensee from taking a listing anywhere in the state.
Representative Lynn clarified that a licensee can't work for two
brokers within the state, either simultaneously or
independently.
2:26:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON moved to report CSHB 267(L&C), as
amended, out of committee with individual recommendations and
the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection,
2d CSHB 267(JUD) was reported from the House Judiciary Standing
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB267 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM HL&C 2/6/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 267 |
| HB267 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM HL&C 2/6/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 267 |
| HB267 Supporting Documents-Letter AK Assoc. Realtors.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM HL&C 2/6/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 267 |
| HB 262- Bill.pdf |
HJUD 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |
| HB 262- Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |
| HB262-LAW-CRIM-02-10-12.pdf |
HJUD 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |
| HB293-DOA-OPA-1-27-12.pdf |
HJUD 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 293 |
| HB293-DOA-PDA-2-11-12.pdf |
HJUD 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 293 |
| HB293 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 293 |
| HB293 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 293 |
| HB293-LAW-CRIM-02-10-12.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 293 |
| HB 293 CS Version M.pdf |
HJUD 2/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 293 |
| HB0267B.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 267 |
| HB 234.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| HB 234 Sponser Statement.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| HB 234 Support Doc.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| HB 234 APOA_Letter of Support.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| HB 267 Title Amendment. Gruenberg.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 267 |
| HB 234 Legal Memo.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| HB 234 ACLU Letter.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| HB0234-1-2-021012-LAW-N.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 234 |
| HB267 Munoz Amendment (H)JUD.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 267 |
| HB 267 AREC minutes-Asst AG remarks Licensed Assistant.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 267 |
| HB 262 CS ( ) I.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |
| HB 262 Amendment Cissna I.1.pdf |
HJUD 2/20/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 262 |